CourtListener 10148894•State v. Lockridge
Gesamter Gesetzestext
THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE
CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING
EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals
The State, Respondent,
v.
Thomas Lockridge, Appellant.
Appellate Case No. 2014-000588
Appeal From York County
Paul M. Burch, Circuit Court Judge
Unpublished Opinion No. 2015-UP-121
Submitted February 1, 2015 – Filed March 11, 2015
APPEAL DISMISSED
Appellate Defender LaNelle Cantey DuRant, of
Columbia, for Appellant.
John Benjamin Aplin and Matthew C. Buchanan, of the
South Carolina Department of Probation, Parole &
Pardon Services, of Columbia, for Respondent.
PER CURIAM: Dismissed after review pursuant to Anders v. California, 386
U.S. 738 (1967). Counsel's motion to be relieved is granted.1
APPEAL DISMISSED.
THOMAS, KONDUROS, and GEATHERS, JJ., concur.
1
We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.
Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.