CourtListener 10148765•Parsons v. Parsons
Gesamter Gesetzestext
THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE
CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING
EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals
Johnny Andrew Parsons, Appellant,
v.
Tabatha Jacobs Parsons, Respondent.
Appellate Case No. 2012-212706
Appeal From Williamsburg County
Angela R. Taylor, Family Court Judge
Unpublished Opinion No. 2015-UP-047
Submitted December 1, 2014 – Filed January 28, 2015
AFFIRMED
Gregory B. Askins, of Askins Chandler & Askins, of
Hemingway, and Brooks Roberts Fudenberg, of Law
Office of Brooks R. Fudenberg, of Mount Pleasant, for
Appellant.
Tabatha Jacobs Parsons, of Georgetown, pro se.
PER CURIAM: Affirmed pursuant to Rule 220(b), SCACR, and the following
authorities: Crossland v. Crossland, 408 S.C. 443, 452, 759 S.E.2d 419, 423
(2014) ("An award of alimony rests within the sound discretion of the family court
and will not be disturbed absent an abuse of discretion."); S.C. Code Ann. § 20-3-
130(C) (2014) (listing the factors a court must consider in determining an award of
alimony); Bodkin v. Bodkin, 388 S.C. 203, 215-16, 694 S.E.2d 230, 237 (Ct. App.
2010) (providing no single factor is dispositive in making an alimony award).
AFFIRMED.1
HUFF, SHORT, and KONDUROS, JJ., concur.
1
We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.
Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.