SCDSS v. Miller

CourtListener 10148631Scctapp06.10.2014

Gesamter Gesetzestext

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE
CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING
EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals

South Carolina Department of Social Services,
Respondent,

v.

Patrecse Miller and Aqien Miller, Defendants,

Of whom Aqien Miller is the Appellant.

In the interest of a minor under the age of 18.

Appellate Case No. 2014-000378

Appeal from Richland County
John M. Rucker, Family Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2014-UP-356
Submitted September 16, 2014 – Filed October 6, 2014

AFFIRMED

Benjamin Reynolds Elliott, of Stevens B. Elliott,
Attorney At Law, of Columbia, for Appellant.

Claude Robin Chandler, of the South Carolina
Department of Social Services, of Columbia, for
Respondent.
Angela L. Kohel and Casey Michal Brown, both of
Richland County CASA, of Columbia, for the Guardian
ad Litem.

PER CURIAM: Aquien Miller appeals the family court's final order terminating
his parental rights to his minor child. See S.C. Code Ann. § 63-7-2570 (2010 &
Supp. 2013). After a review of the transcript and the family court's findings of
facts and conclusions of law pursuant to Ex parte Cauthen, 291 S.C. 465, 354
S.E.2d 381 (1987), we find no meritorious issues that warrant briefing.
Accordingly, we affirm the family court's ruling and relieve Miller's counsel.

AFFIRMED.1

FEW, C.J., and THOMAS and LOCKEMY, JJ., concur.

1
We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.

Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort

Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.