In the Matter of James A. Miller

CourtListener 10148594Scctapp06.08.2014

Gesamter Gesetzestext

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE
CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING
EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals

In the Matter of the Care and Treatment of James A.
Miller, Appellant.

Appellate Case No. 2013-000533

Appeal From Greenville County
Letitia H. Verdin, Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2014-UP-316
Submitted July 1, 2014 – Filed August 6, 2014

APPEAL DISMISSED

Elizabeth Patterson Wiygul, of Greenville, for Appellant.

Senior Assistant Deputy Attorney General Deborah R.J.
Shupe, of Columbia, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM: Dismissed after review pursuant to Anders v. California, 386
U.S. 738 (1967). Counsel's motion to be relieved is granted.1

1
We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.
APPEAL DISMISSED.

HUFF, THOMAS, and McDONALD, JJ., concur.

Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort

Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.