State v. Wise

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE
CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING
EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.

James E. Wise, Appellant.

Appellate Case No. 2013-000196

Appeal From Newberry County
Frank R. Addy, Jr., Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2014-UP-224
Heard April 1, 2014 – Filed June 18, 2014

AFFIRMED

James E. Wise, pro se.

Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Senior
Assistant Deputy Attorney General Salley W. Elliott,
both of Columbia, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM: Affirmed pursuant to Rule 220(b), SCACR, and the following
authorities: Rule 29(a), SCRCrimP ("Except for motions for new trials based on
after-discovered evidence, post-trial motions shall be made within ten (10) days
after the imposition of the sentence."); State v. Taylor, 348 S.C. 152, 160-61, 558
S.E.2d 917, 921 (Ct. App. 2001) (noting a motion for a verdict in arrest of
judgment is a post-trial motion), aff'd, 355 S.C. 392, 585 S.E.2d 303 (2003); State
v. Campbell, 376 S.C. 212, 215, 656 S.E.2d 371, 373 (2008) ("[A] trial judge is
without jurisdiction to consider a criminal matter once the term of court during
which judgment was entered expires."); id. at 216, 656 S.E.2d at 373 ("[I]f [a]
motion is not made within ten days of sentencing, the court will be without
jurisdiction to entertain the motion.").

AFFIRMED.1

WILLIAMS, KONDUROS, and LOCKEMY, JJ., concur.

1
We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.