In the Matter of Timothy Geter

CourtListener 10148507Scctapp25.06.2014

Gesamter Gesetzestext

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE
CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING
EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals

In the Matter of the Care and Treatment of Timothy
Geter, Appellant.

Appellate Case No. 2013-000695

Appeal From Richland County
Clifton Newman, Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2014-UP-253
Submitted April 1, 2014 – Filed June 25, 2014

APPEAL DISMISSED

Appellate Defender LaNelle Cantey DuRant, of
Columbia; and Timothy Geter, pro se, for Appellant.

Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Senior
Assistant Deputy Attorney General Deborah R.J. Shupe,
both of Columbia, for Respondent.
PER CURIAM: Dismissed after consideration of Appellant's pro se brief and
review pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967).1 Counsel's motion
to be relieved is granted.2

APPEAL DISMISSED.

FEW, C.J., and SHORT and GEATHERS, JJ., concur.

1
See also In re McCoy, 360 S.C. 425, 427, 602 S.E.2d 58, 59 (2004) (adopting the
Anders procedure for alleged meritless appeals in sexually violent predator
involuntary commitment appeals).
2
We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.

Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort

Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.