CourtListener 10148354•SCDSS v. Henry W.
Gesamter Gesetzestext
THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE
CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING
EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals
South Carolina Department of Social Services,
Respondent,
v.
Henry W., and Christina S., Defendants,
Of whom Henry W. is the Appellant.
In the interest of a minor child under the age of eighteen.
Appellate Case No. 2013-001191
Appeal From Laurens County
John M. Rucker, Family Court Judge
Unpublished Opinion No. 2014-UP-149
Submitted March 13, 2014 – Filed March 27, 2014
AFFIRMED
Richard Whitney Allen, of The Law Offices of Richard
W. Allen, L.L.C., of Laurens, for Appellant.
Laura Bardsley Houck, of Laurens, for Respondent.
Donna June Jackson, of Clinton, for Guardian ad Litem.
PER CURIAM: Henry W. appeals the family court's final order terminating his
parental rights to his minor child. See S.C. Code Ann. § 63-7-2570 (2010 & Supp.
2013). Upon a thorough review of the record and the family court's findings of
fact and conclusions of law pursuant to Ex parte Cauthen, 291 S.C. 465, 354
S.E.2d 381 (1987), we find no meritorious issues that warrant briefing.
Accordingly, we affirm the family court's ruling.
AFFIRMED.1
WILLIAMS, KONDUROS, and LOCKEMY, JJ., concur.
1
We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.
Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.