CourtListener 10148335•Clark v. Pyramid Masonry Contractors
Gesamter Gesetzestext
THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE
CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING
EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals
James Clark, Jr., Respondent,
v.
Pyramid Masonry Contractors Inc., and Hartford Fire
Insurance Company, Appellants.
Appellate Case No. 2012-212898
Appeal From Fairfield County
Brooks P. Goldsmith, Circuit Court Judge
Unpublished Opinion No. 2014-UP-058
Heard January 9, 2014 – Filed February 12, 2014
DISMISSED
J. Kevin Couch, Willson Jones Carter & Baxley, P.A., of
Greenville, for Appellants.
Gary Walton Popwell, Jr., Lee Eadon Isgett & Popwell,
of Columbia, for Respondent.
PER CURIAM: Pyramid Masonry, Inc. and Hartford Fire Insurance Company
appeal the order of the trial judge affirming the Workers' Compensation
Commission's granting of benefits to James Clark, Jr. We dismiss pursuant to Rule
220(b), SCACR, and the following authorities:
As to interlocutory appeal: Bone v. U.S. Food Serv., 404 S.C. 67, 76, 744 S.E.2d
552, 557 (2013) (stating that an order of the circuit court remanding a case for
additional proceedings before an administrative agency is not directly appealable).
DISMISSED.
HUFF, GEATHERS, and LOCKEMY, JJ., concur.
Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.