State v. Lawrence

CourtListener 10148311Scctapp26.02.2014

Gesamter Gesetzestext

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE
CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING
EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.

Adrian C. Lawrence, Appellant.

Appellate Case No. 2013-001605

Appeal From Sumter County
W. Jeffrey Young, Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2014-UP-077
Submitted January 1, 2014 – Filed February 26, 2014

APPEAL DISMISSED

Appellate Defender Lara Mary Caudy, of Columbia; and
Adrian C. Lawrence, pro se, for Appellant.

Tommy Evans, Jr., and John Benjamin Aplin, both of the
South Carolina Department of Probation, Parole &
Pardon Services, of Columbia, for Respondent.
PER CURIAM: Dismissed after consideration of Appellant's pro se brief and
review pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Counsel's motion to
be relieved is granted.1

APPEAL DISMISSED.

HUFF, GEATHERS, and LOCKEMY, JJ., concur.

1
We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.

Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort

Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.