SCDSS v. Selentia O.

CourtListener 10148267Scctapp31.01.2014

Gesamter Gesetzestext

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE
CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING
EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals

South Carolina Department of Social Services,
Respondent,

v.

Selentia O., Derrick L., Chad H., and Derek G.,
Defendants,

Of whom Selentia O. is the Appellant,

In the interest of minor children under the age of eighteen
years.

Appellate Case No. 2013-001422

Appeal From Spartanburg County
Jerry D. Vinson, Jr., Family Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2014-UP-054
Submitted January 16, 2014 – Filed January 31, 2014

AFFIRMED

Amanda H. Craven, of Harrison White Smith & Coggins,
of Spartanburg, for Appellant.
Deborah Murdock, of the Murdock Law Firm, LLC, of
Mauldin, for Respondent.

Todd Thigpen, of Spartanburg, for Guardian ad Litem.

PER CURIAM: Selentia O. appeals from the family court's final order
terminating her parental rights to her minor children. See S.C. Code Ann. § 63-7-
2570 (2010 & Supp. 2013). Upon a thorough review of the record and the family
court's findings of fact and conclusions of law pursuant to Ex Parte Cauthen, 291
S.C. 465, 354 S.E.2d 381 (1987), we find no meritorious issues that warrant
briefing. Accordingly, we affirm the family court's ruling.

AFFIRMED.1

FEW, C.J., and PIEPER and KONDUROS, JJ., concur.

1
We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.

Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort

Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.