State v. Vanover

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE
CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING
EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.

Glenn Edwin Vanover, Appellant.

Appellate Case No. 2012-212998

Appeal From Lexington County
Perry M. Buckner, Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2013-UP-481
Submitted December 1, 2013 – Filed December 23, 2013

AFFIRMED

Katherine Carruth Goode, of Winnsboro, for Appellant.

Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Assistant
Attorney General Julie Kate Keeney, both of Columbia,
for Respondent.

PER CURIAM: Affirmed pursuant to Rule 220(b), SCACR, and the following
authorities: State v. Dunbar, 356 S.C. 138, 142, 587 S.E.2d 691, 693 (2003)
("[F]or an issue to be preserved for appellate review, it must have been raised to
and ruled upon by the trial [court]." (emphasis added)); id. at 142, 587 S.E.2d at
693-94 ("Issues not raised and ruled upon in the trial court will not be considered
on appeal." (emphasis added)); Jackson v. Speed, 326 S.C. 289, 306, 486 S.E.2d
750, 759 (1997) ("[I]t is the responsibility of trial counsel to preserve issues for
appellate review.").

AFFIRMED.1

HUFF, GEATHERS, and LOCKEMY, JJ., concur.

1
We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.