CourtListener 10148126•State v. Stokes
Gesamter Gesetzestext
THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE
CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING
EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals
The State, Respondent,
v.
John Stokes, Appellant.
Appellate Case No. 2011-190427
Appeal From Sumter County
Howard P. King, Circuit Court Judge
Unpublished Opinion No. 2013-UP-348
Submitted August 1, 2013 – Filed September 4, 2013
APPEAL DISMISSED
Deputy Chief Appellate Defender Wanda H. Carter, of
Columbia, for Appellant.
Tommy Evans, Jr. and Matthew C. Buchanan, both of the
South Carolina Department of Probation, Parole and
Pardon Services, of Columbia, for Respondent.
PER CURIAM: Dismissed after review pursuant to Anders v. California, 386
U.S. 738 (1967).1 Counsel's motion to be relieved is granted.2
APPEAL DISMISSED.
FEW, C.J., and PIEPER and KONDUROS, JJ., concur.
1
Appellant's assertion that the circuit court ordered Appellant "to pay money
owed in the form of a civil judgment" is not substantiated by the record on appeal.
Therefore, Appellant's request that this court remand this appeal for a hearing
regarding the amount of debt owed is denied.
2
We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.
Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.