State v. Rohr

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE
CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING
EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.

Loudin Rohr, Appellant.

Appellate Case No. 2011-189246

Appeal From Dorchester County
Diane Schafer Goodstein, Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2013-UP-174
Heard April 2, 2013 – Filed May 1, 2013

AFFIRMED

Appellate Defender Susan B. Hackett, of Columbia, for
Appellant.

Attorney General Alan M. Wilson, Assistant Attorney
General Jennifer E. Roberts, and Assistant Attorney
General J. Walt Whitmire, all of Columbia, for
Respondent.

PER CURIAM: Loudin Rohr appeals his convictions for assault and battery of a
high and aggravated nature and criminal domestic violence of a high and
aggravated nature, arguing the trial judge erred in allowing the State to
inappropriately bolster the testimony of a child witness. We affirm pursuant to
Rule 220(b), SCACR, and the following authorities: State v. Kromah, 401 S.C.
340, 362, 737 S.E.2d 490, 501 (2013) (finding error in the admission of improper
corroboration testimony may be harmless where there is evidence other than the
corroborated testimony, and the error "could not reasonably have affected the
result of the trial"); State v. Black, 400 S.C. 10, 27, 732 S.E.2d 880, 890 (2012)
("An appellate court generally will decline to set aside a conviction due to
insubstantial errors not affecting the result." (citations omitted)).

AFFIRMED.

SHORT, THOMAS, and PIEPER, JJ., concur.