State v. Alewine

CourtListener 10147950Scctapp15.05.2013

Gesamter Gesetzestext

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE
CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING
EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.

Eddie F. Alewine, Appellant.

Appellate Case No. 2012-212343

Appeal From Lexington County
D. Craig Brown, Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2013-UP-201
Submitted April 1, 2013 – Filed May 15, 2013

APPEAL DISMISSED

Chief Appellate Defender Robert M. Pachak, of
Columbia; and Eddie F. Alewine, pro se, for Appellant.

Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Senior
Assistant Deputy Attorney General Salley W. Elliott,
both of Columbia; and Solicitor Donald V. Myers, of
Lexington, for Respondent.
PER CURIAM: Dismissed after consideration of appellant's pro se brief and
review pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Counsel's motion to
be relieved is granted.1

APPEAL DISMISSED.

FEW, C.J., and GEATHERS and LOCKEMY, JJ., concur.

1
We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.

Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort

Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.