State v. Laird

CourtListener 10147946Scctapp15.05.2013

Gesamter Gesetzestext

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE
CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING
EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.

Leroy Laird, Appellant.

Appellate Case No. 2012-207806

Appeal From Aiken County
Doyet A. Early, III, Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2013-UP-192
Submitted April 1, 2013 – Filed May 15, 2013

APPEAL DISMISSED

Chief Appellate Defender Robert M. Dudek, of
Columbia, for Appellant.

Tommy Evans, Jr., of the South Carolina Department of
Probation, Parole & Pardon Services, of Columbia, for
Respondent.
PER CURIAM: Dismissed after review pursuant to Anders v. California, 386
U.S. 738 (1967). Counsel's motion to be relieved is granted.1

APPEAL DISMISSED.

HUFF, WILLIAMS, and KONDUROS, JJ., concur.

1
We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.

Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort

Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.