Bilal S. Haynesworth v. State

CourtListener 10147876Scctapp21.06.2023

Gesamter Gesetzestext

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE
CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING
EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals

Bilal S. Haynesworth, Petitioner,

v.

State of South Carolina, Respondent.

Appellate Case No. 2019-001249

Appeal From Lexington County
Walton J. McLeod, IV, Post-Conviction Relief Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2023-UP-247
Submitted May 1, 2023 – Filed June 21, 2023

CERTIORARI DISMISSED AS IMPROVIDENTLY
GRANTED

Appellate Defender Kathrine Haggard Hudgins, of
Columbia, for Petitioner.

Attorney General Alan Wilson and Senior Assistant
Deputy Attorney General William M. Blitch, Jr., both of
Columbia, for Respondent.
PER CURIAM: We issued a writ of certiorari to review the post-conviction relief
(PCR) court's denial of Petitioner Bilal S. Haynesworth's application for PCR. We
now dismiss the writ as improvidently granted.

DISMISSED AS IMPROVIDENTLY GRANTED. 1

THOMAS, MCDONALD, and HEWITT, JJ., concur.

1
We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.

Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort

Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.