CourtListener 10147863•State v. Michael A. Walcott
Gesamter Gesetzestext
THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE
CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING
EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals
The State, Respondent,
v.
Michael Andre Walcott, Appellant.
Appellate Case No. 2021-000738
Appeal From Aiken County
Clifton B. Newman, Circuit Court Judge
Unpublished Opinion No. 2023-UP-253
Submitted June 1, 2023 – Filed June 28, 2023
APPEAL DISMISSED
Appellate Defender Jessica M. Saxon, of Columbia, for
Appellant.
Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Senior
Assistant Deputy Attorney General William M. Blitch,
Jr., both of Columbia; and Solicitor John William Weeks,
of Aiken, all for Respondent.
PER CURIAM: Dismissed after review pursuant to Anders v. California, 386
U.S. 738 (1967). Counsel's motion to be relieved is granted.
APPEAL DISMISSED. 1
THOMAS, MCDONALD, and HEWITT, JJ., concur.
1
We decide this case without argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.
Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.