State v. Flood

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE
CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING
EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.

Cedric Flood, Appellant.

Appellate Case No. 2011-196546

Appeal From Orangeburg County
Edgar W. Dickson, Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2013-UP-140
Submitted February 1, 2013 – Filed April 10, 2013

AFFIRMED

Appellate Defender Susan B. Hackett, of Columbia, for
Appellant.

Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Assistant
Attorney General Julie K. Keeney, both of Columbia;
and Solicitor David M. Pascoe, of Orangeburg, for
Respondent.
PER CURIAM: Affirmed pursuant to Rule 220(b), SCACR, and the following
authorities: State v. Dunbar, 356 S.C. 138, 142, 587 S.E.2d 691, 693-94 (2003)
("In order for an issue to be preserved for appellate review, it must have been
raised to and ruled upon by the trial judge. Issues not raised and ruled upon in the
trial court will not be considered on appeal."); Pinckney v. Pettijohn Builders, Inc.,
289 S.C. 405, 407, 346 S.E.2d 533, 534 (Ct. App. 1986) (holding a party may not
argue on appeal that a jury charge was erroneous where trial counsel stated he had
no objection to a specific aspect of the jury charge).

AFFIRMED.1

HUFF, WILLIAMS, and KONDUROS, JJ., concur.

1
We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.