State v. McKnight

CourtListener 10147737Scctapp13.03.2013

Gesamter Gesetzestext

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE
CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING
EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.

Michael McKnight, Appellant.

Appellate Case No. 2011-205427

Appeal From Calhoun County
R. Ferrell Cothran, Jr., Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2013-UP-101
Submitted January 1, 2013 – Filed March 13, 2013

APPEAL DISMISSED

Appellate Defender Robert M. Pachak, of Columbia, for
Appellant.

John Benjamin Aplin, of the South Carolina Department
of Probation, Parole & Pardon Services, of Columbia, for
Respondent.
PER CURIAM: Dismissed after review pursuant to Anders v. California, 386
U.S. 738 (1967). Counsel's motion to be relieved is granted.1

APPEAL DISMISSED.

FEW, C.J., and WILLIAMS and PIEPER JJ., concur.

1
We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.

Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort

Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.