State v. Williams

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE
CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING
EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.

Trey Williams, Appellant.

Appellate Case No. 2010-162886

Appeal From York County
John C. Hayes, III, Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2013-UP-102
Submitted January 1, 2013 – Filed March 13, 2013

AFFIRMED

Appellate Defender LaNelle Cantey DuRant, of
Columbia, for Appellant.

Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson, Chief Deputy
Attorney General John W. McIntosh, Senior Assistant
Deputy Attorney General Salley W. Elliott, and Assistant
Attorney General Julie Kate Keeney, all of Columbia;
and Solicitor Kevin S. Brackett, of York, for Respondent.
PER CURIAM: Affirmed pursuant to Rule 220(b), SCACR, and the following
authorities: State v. Laney, 367 S.C. 639, 643, 627 S.E.2d 726, 729 (2006)
("In criminal cases, this [c]ourt sits to review errors of law only and is bound
by factual findings of the trial court unless an abuse of discretion is shown.");
United States v. Holmen, 586 F.2d 322, 323-24 (4th Cir. 1978) (finding no
error in trial court's denial of defendant's motion to withdraw a waiver of his
right to a jury trial when the defendant made his motion on the day prior to
trial and the witnesses had already been subpoenaed).

AFFIRMED.1

FEW, C.J., WILLIAMS, J., and PIEPER, J., concur.

1
We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.