Stegall v. State

CourtListener 10147722Scctapp27.03.2013

Gesamter Gesetzestext

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE
CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING
EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals

Raymond Stegall, Petitioner,

v.

State of South Carolina, Respondent.

Appellate Case No. 2010-150450

Appeal From Charleston County
Deadra L. Jefferson, Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2013-UP-119
Submitted February 1, 2013 – Filed March 27, 2013

APPEAL DISMISSED

Appellate Defender Robert M. Pachak, of Columbia, for
Petitioner.

Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson, Chief Deputy
Attorney General John W. McIntosh, Senior Assistant
Deputy Attorney General Salley W. Elliott, and Assistant
Attorney Matthew J. Friedman, all of Columbia, for
Respondent.
PER CURIAM: Petitioner seeks a writ of certiorari from the denial of his
application for post-conviction relief. The State consents to Petitioner's request
for a belated direct appeal. Accordingly, we grant certiorari and proceed with a
review of the direct appeal issue pursuant to Davis v. State, 288 S.C. 290, 342
S.E.2d 60 (1986).

Petitioner appeals his convictions of armed robbery, assault of a high and
aggravated nature, and possession of a weapon during the commission of a violent
crime. We dismiss his appeal after review pursuant to Anders v. California, 386
U.S. 738 (1967). Counsel's motion to be relieved is granted.

APPEAL DISMISSED.1

HUFF, WILLIAMS, and KONDUROS, JJ., concur.

1
We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.

Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort

Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.