CourtListener 10147599•South Carolina Department of Social Services v. Lacy M.
South Carolina Department of Social Services v. Lacy M.
CourtListener 10147599Scctapp13.12.2012
Gesamter Gesetzestext
THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE
CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING
EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals
South Carolina Department of Social Services,
Respondent,
v.
Lacy M., L.C. H., Terrell M., and Van (last name
unknown), Respondents,
Of whom Terrell M. is the Appellant,
In the interest of minor children under the age of 18
years.
Appellate Case No. 2012-212637
Appeal From Spartanburg County
James F. Fraley, Jr., Family Court Judge
Unpublished Opinion No. 2012-UP-671
Submitted December 3, 2012 – Filed December 13, 2012
AFFIRMED
Kelly Nicole Lee and Anna Hamilton, both of Nelson
Mullins Riley & Scarborough, LLP, of Greenville, for
Appellant.
Deborah Murdock, of Murdock Law Firm, LLC, of
Mauldin, for Respondent.
Todd Thigpen, of Law Office of Michael Todd Thigpen,
of Spartanburg, for the Guardian ad Litem.
PER CURIAM: Terrell M. appeals the family court's final order terminating his
parental rights to his minor children. See S.C. Code Ann. § 63-7-2570 (2010 &
Supp. 2011). Upon a thorough review of the record and the family court's findings
of facts and conclusions of law pursuant to Ex Parte Cauthen, 291 S.C. 465, 354
S.E.2d 381 (1987), we find no meritorious issues that warrant briefing.
Accordingly, we affirm the family court's ruling.
AFFIRMED.1
SHORT, KONDUROS, and LOCKEMY, JJ., concur.
1
We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.
Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.