Wheeler v. Spartanburg School District Six

CourtListener 10147493Scctapp24.10.2012

Gesamter Gesetzestext

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE
CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING
EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals

Beverly R. Wheeler, Appellant,

v.

Spartanburg School District Six and Wausau Business
Insurance Company, Respondents.

Appellate Case No. 2011-191506

Appeal from the Workers' Compensation Commission

Unpublished Opinion No. 2012-UP-570
Heard October 3, 2012 – Filed October 24, 2012

AFFIRMED

Toney J. Lister, Lister, Flynn & Kelly, P.A., of
Spartanburg, for Appellant.

Jason A. Griggs, Willson Jones Carter & Baxley, P.A., of
Greenville, for Respondents.

PER CURIAM: Beverly Wheeler appeals the workers' compensation
commission's decision denying her claim for benefits. We find that substantial
evidence supports the commission's decision and that it was not affected by an
error of law. Therefore, we affirm pursuant to Rule 220(b)(1), SCACR, and
Bentley v. Spartanburg Cnty., 398 S.C. 418, 421, 730 S.E.2d 296, 298 (2012)
(stating "an appellate court may not substitute its judgment for that of the agency
as to the weight of the evidence on questions of fact, but it may reverse when the
decision is affected by an error of law").

AFFIRMED.

FEW, C.J., and WILLIAMS and PIEPER, JJ., concur.

Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort

Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.