SCDSS v. Lakeisha S.

CourtListener 10147427Scctapp06.08.2012

Gesamter Gesetzestext

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE
CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING
EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals

South Carolina Department of Social Services,
Respondent,

v.

Lakeisha S. and Sidney A., Defendants,

Of whom Lakeisha S. is the Appellant,

In the Interest of a minor under the age of 18.

Appellate Case No. 2012-210466

Appeal From Greenville County
W. Marsh Robertson, Family Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2012-UP-488
Submitted July 31, 2012 – Filed August 6, 2012

AFFIRMED

Jonathan Ashley Neal, of Greenville, for Appellant.

Kathryn Walsh Gooch, of Greenville, and Deborah
Murdock, of the Murdock Law Firm, LLC, of Mauldin,
for Respondent.
Robert A. Clark, of Greenville, for Guardian ad Litem.

PER CURIAM: Lakeisha S. appeals from the family court's final order
terminating her parental rights to her minor child. See S.C. Code Ann. § 63-7-
2570 (2010 & Supp. 2011). Upon a thorough review of the record and the family
court's findings of fact and conclusions of law pursuant to Ex Parte Cauthen, 291
S.C. 465, 354 S.E.2d 381 (1987), we find no meritorious issues warrant briefing.
Accordingly, we affirm the family court's ruling.

AFFIRMED.

FEW, C.J., and HUFF and SHORT, JJ., concur.

Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort

Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.