CourtListener 10147427•SCDSS v. Lakeisha S.
Gesamter Gesetzestext
THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE
CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING
EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals
South Carolina Department of Social Services,
Respondent,
v.
Lakeisha S. and Sidney A., Defendants,
Of whom Lakeisha S. is the Appellant,
In the Interest of a minor under the age of 18.
Appellate Case No. 2012-210466
Appeal From Greenville County
W. Marsh Robertson, Family Court Judge
Unpublished Opinion No. 2012-UP-488
Submitted July 31, 2012 – Filed August 6, 2012
AFFIRMED
Jonathan Ashley Neal, of Greenville, for Appellant.
Kathryn Walsh Gooch, of Greenville, and Deborah
Murdock, of the Murdock Law Firm, LLC, of Mauldin,
for Respondent.
Robert A. Clark, of Greenville, for Guardian ad Litem.
PER CURIAM: Lakeisha S. appeals from the family court's final order
terminating her parental rights to her minor child. See S.C. Code Ann. § 63-7-
2570 (2010 & Supp. 2011). Upon a thorough review of the record and the family
court's findings of fact and conclusions of law pursuant to Ex Parte Cauthen, 291
S.C. 465, 354 S.E.2d 381 (1987), we find no meritorious issues warrant briefing.
Accordingly, we affirm the family court's ruling.
AFFIRMED.
FEW, C.J., and HUFF and SHORT, JJ., concur.
Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.