State v. Thomas

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE
CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING
EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.

Clark David Thomas a/k/a George Keith Nichols,
Appellant.

Appellate Case No. 2008-097112

Appeal From Charleston County
Deadra L. Jefferson, Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2012-UP-486
Submitted July 2, 2012 – Filed August 8, 2012

APPEAL DISMISSED

Kathrine Haggard Hudgins, of Columbia, and Clark
David Thomas, pro se, for Appellant.

Attorney General Alan Wilson, Chief Deputy Attorney
General John W. McIntosh, Senior Assistant Deputy
Attorney General Salley W. Elliott, all of Columbia; and
Solicitor Scarlett Anne Wilson, of Charleston, for
Respondent.
PER CURIAM: Clark David Thomas appeals his convictions of kidnapping and
criminal domestic violence of a high and aggravated nature, arguing his right to a
speedy trial was violated. Thomas filed a pro se brief. After a thorough review of
the record and all briefs pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and
State v. Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we dismiss the appeal and
grant counsel's motion to be relieved.1

APPEAL DISMISSED.

FEW, C.J., HUFF and SHORT, JJ., concur.

1
We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.