State v. McGhaney

CourtListener 10147405Scctapp29.08.2012

Gesamter Gesetzestext

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE
CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING
EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.

Adolph McGhaney, Appellant.

Appellate Case No. 2010-163746

Appeal From Sumter County
R. Ferrell Cothran, Jr., Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2012-UP-495
Submitted August 1, 2012 – Filed August 29, 2012

APPEAL DISMISSED

Chief Appellate Defender Robert M. Dudek, of
Columbia, for Appellant.

Attorney General Alan Wilson, Chief Deputy Attorney
General John W. McIntosh, Senior Assistant Deputy
Attorney General Donald J. Zelenka, all of Columbia;
and Solicitor Ernest A. Finney, III, of Sumter, for
Respondent.
PER CURIAM: Dismissed1 after review pursuant to Anders v. California, 386
U.S. 738 (1967). Counsel's motion to be relieved is granted.

APPEAL DISMISSED.

FEW, C.J., and WILLIAMS and PIEPER, JJ., concur.

1
We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.

Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort

Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.