State v. Phillips

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD
NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY
PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.
Jerry Phillips, Appellant.

__________

Appeal From Cherokee County
J. Mark Hayes, II, Circuit Court Judge
__________

Unpublished Opinion No. 2012-UP-447
Submitted June 1, 2012 – Filed July 18, 2012
__________

APPEAL DISMISSED
__________

Appellate Defender Robert M. Pachak, of Columbia,
and Jerry Phillips, pro se, for Appellant.

Attorney General Alan Wilson, Chief Deputy
Attorney General John W. McIntosh, and Senior
Assistant Deputy Attorney General Salley W. Elliott,
all of Columbia; and Solicitor Barry J. Barnette, of
Spartanburg, for Respondent.
PER CURIAM: Jerry Phillips appeals his conviction of unlawful
conduct toward a child, arguing the circuit court erred in giving him a
sentence that differed from his co-defendant's sentence. Phillips also asserts
several pro se arguments. After a thorough review of the record and all briefs
pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and State v. Williams,
305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we dismiss1 the appeal and grant
counsel's motion to be relieved.

APPEAL DISMISSED.

FEW, C.J., and HUFF and SHORT, JJ., concur.

1
We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.