State v. Richey

CourtListener 10147323Scctapp09.11.2007

Gesamter Gesetzestext

THIS OPINION HAS NO
PRECEDENTIAL VALUE.  IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY
PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 239(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA

In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.

Leonard Richey, Appellant.

Appeal From Anderson County

Roger L. Couch, Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2007-UP-522

Submitted October 1, 2007 – Filed November
9, 2007

APPEAL DISMISSED

Appellate Defender Eleanor Duffy Cleary, of Columbia, for
Appellant.

Attorney General Henry Dargan McMaster, Chief Deputy Attorney
General John W. McIntosh, Assistant Deputy Attorney General Salley W. Elliott, all
of Columbia, and Solicitor Christina T. Adams, of Anderson, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM:  A
jury found Leonard Richey guilty of second degree burglary.  Richey was
sentenced to twelve years imprisonment.  Pursuant to Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738 (1967), appellant’s counsel attached a petition to be relieved.

After review of the
record pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967) and State
v. Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we dismiss this appeal
and grant counsel’s petition to be relieved.[1]

APPEAL
DISMISSED.  

Hearn, CJ.,
Huff, and Kittredge , JJ., concur.

[1] We decide this case without oral argument
pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.

Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort

Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.