CourtListener 10143079•State v. Cook
Gesamter Gesetzestext
THIS OPINION HAS NO
PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY
PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 239(d)(2), SCACR.
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals
The State, Respondent,
v.
Roy Roger Cook, Appellant.
Appeal From Florence County
Steven H. John, Circuit Court Judge
Unpublished Opinion No. 2007-UP-406
Submitted October 1, 2007 Filed October
4, 2007
APPEAL DISMISSED
Appellate Defender Eleanor Duffy Cleary, South Carolina Commission
on Indigent Defense, of Columbia, for Appellant.
Attorney General Henry Dargan McMaster, Chief Deputy Attorney
General John W. McIntosh, Assistant Deputy Attorney General Salley W. Elliott,
Office of the Attorney General, of Columbia; and Solicitor Edgar Lewis Clements,
III, of Florence, for Respondent.
PER CURIAM: Appellant, Roy Roger Cook, was indicted for and
convicted of second degree burglary. The trial court sentenced Cook to three
years imprisonment. Cooks
counsel attached to the brief a petition to be relieved as counsel, stating
that she had reviewed the record and concluded this appeal lacks merit. Cook
did not file a separate pro se brief. After a
thorough review of the record pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S.
738 (1967) and State v. Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991),
we dismiss[1] the appeal and grant counsels petition to be relieved.
APPEAL
DISMISSED.
HEARN,
C.J., HUFF, and KITTREDGE, JJ., concur.
[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to
Rule 215, SCACR.
Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.