CourtListener 10143078•State v. Fields
Gesamter Gesetzestext
THIS OPINION HAS NO
PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY
PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 239(d)(2), SCACR.
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals
The State, Respondent,
v.
Tyrone Fields, Appellant.
Appeal From Orangeburg County
James C. Williams, Jr., Circuit Court
Judge
Unpublished Opinion No. 2007-UP-409
Submitted October 1, 2007 Filed October
4, 2007
APPEAL DISMISSED
Appellate Defender Aileen P. Clare, South Carolina Commission, of Columbia, for Appellant.
John Benjamin Aplin, S.C. Dept. of Probation Parole & Pardon,
of Columbia, for Respondent.
PER CURIAM: Appellant, Tyrone Fields, pled guilty to shoplifting
and was sentenced to seven years imprisonment, suspended to three years of
probation. Following a probation revocation hearing, the court revoked
eighteen months of Fields suspended sentence and terminated his probation.
Fields counsel attached to
the brief a petition to be relieved as counsel, stating that she had reviewed
the record and concluded this appeal lacks merit. Fields did not file a separate pro se brief. After a
thorough review of the record pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S.
738 (1967) and State v. Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991),
we dismiss[1] the appeal and grant counsels petition to be relieved.
APPEAL
DISMISSED.
HEARN,
C.J., HUFF, and KITTREDGE, JJ., concur.
[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to
Rule 215, SCACR.
Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.