State v. McCollum

CourtListener 10143066Scctapp08.10.2007

Gesamter Gesetzestext

THIS OPINION HAS NO
PRECEDENTIAL VALUE.  IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY
PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 239(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA

In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.

Tisha Louise
McCollum, Appellant.

Appeal From Charleston County

 J. C. Buddy Nicholson, Jr., Circuit Court
Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2007-UP-417

Submitted October 1, 2007 – Filed October
8, 2007   

APPEAL DISMISSED

Appellate Defender Aileen P. Clare, of Columbia, for Appellant.

Attorney General Henry Dargan McMaster, Chief Deputy Attorney
General John W. McIntosh, Assistant Deputy Attorney General Salley W. Elliott,
of Columbia, Ralph E. Hoisington, of Charleston, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM:  Appellant, Tisha Louise McCollum, entered a plea of no
contest to use of a vehicle without permission.  The trial court sentenced her
to one year, suspended upon service of time served and three years of
probation.  McCollum’s counsel
attached to the brief a petition to be relieved as counsel, stating that she
had reviewed the record and concluded this appeal lacks merit.  McCollum did
not file a separate pro se brief.  After a thorough review of the
record pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967) and State
v. Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we dismiss[1] the appeal and grant counsel’s petition to be relieved.

APPEAL
DISMISSED.

HEARN,
C.J., HUFF, and KITTREDGE, JJ., concur.

[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to
Rule 215, SCACR.

Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort

Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.