State v. Outen

THIS
OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE.  IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS
PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 239(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA

In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.

Alfred Outen, Appellant.

Appeal from Richland County

 Alison Renee Lee, Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2007-UP-454

Submitted October 1, 2007 – Filed October
10, 2007   

APPEAL DISMISSED

Assistant Appellate Defender Eleanor Duffy Cleary, of Columbia, for Appellant.

Attorney General Henry Dargan McMaster, Chief Deputy Attorney
General John W. McIntosh, and Assistant Deputy Attorney General Salley W.
Elliott, of Columbia; and Warren B. Giese, also of Columbia, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM: 
Alfred Outen pled guilty to second-degree burglary and petit larceny.  He
received five years for second-degree burglary and thirty days, concurrent, for
petit larceny.  On appeal, Outen alleges the plea judge erred in accepting his plea
without fully advising him of the constitutional rights he waived by pleading
guilty.  Outen did not file a pro se brief.  After a thorough
review of the record and counsel’s brief pursuant to Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738 (1967), and State v. Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357
(1991), we dismiss the appeal and grant counsel’s motion to be relieved.[1]

APPEAL
DISMISSED.

HEARN, C.J., HUFF
and KITTREDGE, JJ., concur.

[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to
Rule 215, SCACR.