State v. Mack

THIS OPINION HAS NO
PRECEDENTIAL VALUE.  IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY
PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 239(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA

In the Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.

Longeno Odinga Mack, Appellant.

Appeal From Richland County

G. Thomas Cooper, Jr., Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2007-UP-473

Submitted October 1, 2007 – Filed October
11, 2007   

APPEAL DISMISSED

Chief
Attorney Joseph L. Savitz, III, South Carolina of Columbia, for Appellant.

Attorney General Henry Dargan McMaster, Chief Deputy Attorney
General John W. McIntosh, Assistant Deputy Attorney General Salley W. Elliott, all
of Columbia; and Solicitor Warren B. Giese, of Columbia, for Respondent.

PER
CURIAM:  Longeno Odinga
Mack appeals his guilty pleas for resisting arrest, possession of crack with
intent to distribute (second offense), possession of cocaine with intent to
distribute (second offense), and possession of marijuana with intent to
distribute (second offense).  He asserts his guilty plea was rendered
conditional and therefore invalid by the trial judge informing him of the right
to an appeal. After a thorough review of
the record and counsel’s brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386
U.S. 738 (1967), and State v. Williams,
305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we dismiss[1] Mack’s appeal and grant counsel’s motion to be relieved.

APPEAL
DISMISSED.

HEARN, C.J.,
HUFF and KITTREDGE, JJ., concur.

[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to
Rule 215, SCACR.