CourtListener 10143020•State v. McKinney
Gesamter Gesetzestext
THIS OPINION HAS NO
PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY
PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 239(d)(2), SCACR.
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals
The State, Respondent,
v.
Monique L.
McKinney, Appellant.
Appeal From Charleston County
R. Markley Dennis, Jr., Circuit Court
Judge
Unpublished Opinion No. 2007-UP-466
ubmitted October 1, 2007 Filed October
11, 2007
APPEAL DISMISSED
Chief Attorney Joseph L. Savitz, III, of Columbia, for Appellant
Attorney General Henry Dargan McMaster, Chief Deputy Attorney
General John W. McIntosh, Assistant Deputy Attorney General Salley W. Elliott,
of Columbia, Ralph E. Hoisington, of Charleston, for Respondent.
PER CURIAM: Appellant, Monique McKinney, pled guilty
to armed robbery, kidnapping, possession of a firearm during commission of a
violent crime, possession of a firearm by a person under 21, credit card theft,
and credit card fraud. The trial judge sentenced her to ten years on both the
robbery and kidnapping charges, five years on each of the firearm charges, and
one year on each of the credit card charges with the sentences concurrent. McKinneys counsel attached to the brief
a petition to be relieved as counsel, stating that he had reviewed the record
and concluded this appeal lacks merit. McKinney filed
a separate pro se brief. After
a thorough review of the record pursuant to Anders v. California, 386
U.S. 738 (1967) and State v. Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357
(1991), we dismiss[1] the appeal and grant counsels petition to be relieved.
APPEAL
DISMISSED.
HEARN,
CJ., HUFF, and KITTREDGE, JJ., concur.
[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to
Rule 215, SCACR.
Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.