State v. Brown

CourtListener 10143010Scctapp12.10.2007

Gesamter Gesetzestext

THIS
OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE.  IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS
PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 239(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA

In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.

Arkella Rena
Brown, Appellant.

Appeal from Richland County

 John C. Hayes, III, Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No.  2007-UP-479

Submitted October 1, 2007 – Filed October
12, 2007

APPEAL DISMISSED

Assistant Appellate Defender Robert M. Dudek, Office of Appellate
Defense, of Columbia, for Appellant.

Attorney General Henry Dargan McMaster, Chief Deputy Attorney
General John W. McIntosh, and Assistant Deputy Attorney General Salley W.
Elliott, of the Office of the Attorney General;  and Solicitor Warren B. Giese,
all of Columbia, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM: 
Arkella Rena Brown pled guilty to shoplifting over $1000.  She received three
years.  On appeal, Brown alleges the plea judge erred in accepting her plea without
fully advising her of her constitutional rights.  Brown did not file a pro se brief.  After a thorough review of the record and counsel’s brief
pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967) and State v.
Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we dismiss the appeal and
grant counsel’s motion to be relieved.[1]

APPEAL
DISMISSED.

HEARN, C.J.,
HUFF and KITTREDGE, JJ., concur.

[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to
Rule 215, SCACR.

Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort

Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.