State v. Oliver

CourtListener 10143005Scctapp12.10.2007

Gesamter Gesetzestext

THIS
OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE.  IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS
PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 239(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA

In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.

Michael Douglas
Oliver, Appellant.

Appeal from Greenwood County

 Wyatt T. Saunders, Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2007-UP-477

Submitted October 1, 2007 – Filed October
12, 2007   

APPEAL DISMISSED

Assistant Appellate Defender Aileen P. Clare, of Columbia, for
Appellant.

Attorney General Henry Dargan McMaster, Chief Deputy Attorney
General John W. McIntosh, Assistant Deputy Attorney General Salley W. Elliott,
all of Columbia; Jerry W. Peace, of Greenwood, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM: 
Michael Douglas Oliver pled guilty to accessory after the fact of armed
robbery.  He received twelve years, suspended upon service of eight years and
probation of three years.  On appeal, Oliver alleges his sentence is
unconstitutionally disproportionate.  Oliver did not file a pro se brief.  After a thorough review of the record and counsel’s brief pursuant to Anders
v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967) and State v. Williams, 305 S.C.
116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we dismiss the appeal and grant counsel’s motion to
be relieved.[1]

APPEAL
DISMISSED.

HEARN, C.J.,
HUFF and KITTREDGE, JJ., concur.

[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to
Rule 215, SCACR.

Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort

Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.