State v. Bryant

CourtListener 10143001Scctapp15.10.2007

Gesamter Gesetzestext

THIS OPINION HAS NO
PRECEDENTIAL VALUE.  IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY
PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 239(d)(2), SCACR

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA

In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.

Crystal Bryant, Appellant.

Appeal From Spartanburg County

 John C. Few, Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No.  2007-UP-491

Submitted October 1, 2007 – Filed October
15, 2007

APPEAL DISMISSED

Appellate Defender Robert M. Dudek, South Carolina Commission on
Indigent Defense, of Columbia, for Appellant.

Attorney General Henry Dargan McMaster; Chief Deputy Attorney
General John W. McIntosh; and Assistant Deputy Attorney General Salley W.
Elliott, all of the Office of the Attorney General, of Columbia; and Solicitor Harold
W. Gowdy, III, of Spartanburg, for Respondent

PER CURIAM: Crystal
Bryant was convicted of common law robbery.  She was sentenced under the
Youthful Offender Act to a sentence of an indeterminate length, not to exceed
six years, and was required to participate in a drug treatment program.  On
appeal, Bryant contends the trial court erred in failing to direct a verdict in
her favor due to insufficient evidence.  Bryant did not file a pro se brief.  After a thorough review of the record and counsel’s brief pursuant to Anders
v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1969), and State v. Williams, 305 S.C.
116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we dismiss the appeal and grant counsel’s motion to
be relieved.[1]

APPEAL
DISMISSED.

HEARN, C.J., HUFF and KITTREDGE, JJ., concur.       

[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to
Rule 215, SCRACR.

Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort

Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.