CourtListener 10142981•State v. Rush
Gesamter Gesetzestext
THIS OPINION HAS NO
PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY
PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 239(d)(2), SCACR.
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals
The State, Respondent,
v.
David Lewis
Rush, Appellant.
Appeal From Horry County
Paula H. Thomas, Circuit Court Judge
Unpublished Opinion No. 2007-UP-506
Submitted October 1, 2007 Filed October 30, 2007
AFFIRMED
Appellate Defender Eleanor Duffy Cleary, of Columbia, for
Appellant.
Attorney General Henry Dargan McMaster, Chief Deputy Attorney
General John W. McIntosh, Assistant Deputy Attorney General Salley W. Elliott, Assistant
Attorney General Shawn L. Reeves, all of Columbia; and Solicitor John Gregory
Hembree, of Conway, for Respondent.
PER CURIAM: David
Lewis Rush appeals his conviction for assault and battery with intent to kill[1] arguing the trial court erred in failing
to instruct the jury regarding self-defense.[2]
We affirm pursuant to Rule 220(c), SCACR, and the following authority: Jackson
v. State, 355 S.C. 568, 570-71, 586 S.E.2d 562, 563 (2003) (holding a
defendant is not entitled to a self-defense charge where the defendant is not
without fault in bringing on the difficulty).
AFFIRMED.
STILWELL, SHORT, and WILLIAMS JJ., concur.
[1] Rush does not appeal his conviction for
assault and battery of a high and aggravated nature.
[2] We decide this case without oral argument
pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.
Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.