State v. Lee

THIS OPINION HAS NO
PRECEDENTIAL VALUE.  IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY
PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 239(d)(2), SCACR

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA

In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.

Garry David Lee, II, Appellant.

Appeal From Spartanburg County

 J. Mark Hayes, II, Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No.2007-UP-282

Submitted May 1, 2007 – Filed June 6, 2007   

APPEAL DISMISSED

Assistant Appellate Defender Aileen P. Clare, of Columbia, for
Appellant.

Attorney General Henry Dargan McMaster, Chief Deputy Attorney
General John W. McIntosh, Assistant Deputy Attorney General Salley W. Elliott
of Columbia; and Solicitor Harold W. Gowdy, of Spartanburg, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM:  Appellant,
Garry David Lee, II, pled guilty to first-degree burglary, second-degree
burglary, safecracking, grand larceny of between $1,000 and $5,000, grand
larceny of more than $5,000, and arson.  {R. 3, 12-13, 47-60}  The trial
judge sentenced him to concurrent terms of twenty-five years each on the arson,
safecracking, and first-degree burglary charges, and ten years for grand
larceny of greater than $5,000,  five years for grand larceny between $1,000
and $5,000, and fifteen years for second-degree burglary. {R. 23, 49, 52,
55, 58, 59, 60}  Lee’s
counsel attached to the brief a petition to be relieved as counsel, stating
that she had reviewed the record and concluded this appeal lacks merit.  Lee
did not file a separate pro se brief.  After a
thorough review of the record pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S.
738 (1967) and State v. Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991),
we dismiss[1] the appeal and grant counsel’s petition to be relieved.

APPEAL
DISMISSED.

ANDERSON,
HUFF, and BEATTY, JJ., concur.

[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to
Rule 215, SCACR.