State v. Clayton

THIS OPINION HAS NO
PRECEDENTIAL VALUE.  IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY
PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 239(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA

In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.

Jack McDaniel Clayton, Appellant.

Appeal From Pickens County

 Wyatt T. Saunders, Jr, Circuit Court
Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2007-UP-284

Submitted June 1,2007 – Filed June 7, 2007

APPEAL DISMISSED

Appellate Defender Aileen P. Clare, of Columbia, for Appellant.

J. Benjamin Aplin,  S.C. Dept. of Probation Parole & Pardon,
of Columbia, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM: Clayton appeals
the revocation of his probation.  Clayton
maintains the trial court erred in revoking his probation because the State
failed to present evidence of any violations.  After a thorough review of the
record and counsel’s brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S.
738 (1967), and State v. Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991),
we dismiss[1] Clayton’s appeal and grant counsel’s motion to be relieved.

APPEAL
DISMISSED.

HEARN, C.J.,
KITTREDGE, J., and CURETON, A.J., concur.

[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to
Rule 215, SCACR.