State v. Frederick

CourtListener 10142898Scctapp07.06.2007

Gesamter Gesetzestext

THIS
OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE.  IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS
PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 239(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA

In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.

Dwayne Lamont Frederick, Appellant.

Appeal From Richland County

 L. Casey Manning, Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2007-UP-285

Submitted June 1, 2007 – Filed June 7,
2007

APPEAL DISMISSED

Appellate Defender Aileen P. Clare, of Columbia,  for Appellant.

Attorney General Henry Dargan McMaster, Chief Deputy Attorney
General John W. McIntosh, Assistant Deputy Attorney General Salley W. Elliott,
Office of the Attorney General, of Columbia; and Solicitor Warren Blair Giese,
Fifth Circuit Solicitor’s Office, all of Columbia, for Respondents.

PER CURIAM:  Frederick appeals his
guilty plea to first-degree burglary and first-degree criminal sexual conduct. 
He was sentenced to concurrent terms of twenty-three years in prison.  Frederick maintains the trial court erred in accepting appellant’s guilty plea without
ordering a mental examination.  After a
thorough review of the record and counsel’s brief pursuant to Anders v.
California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and State v. Williams, 305 S.C.
116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we dismiss[1] Frederick’s appeal and grant counsel’s motion to be relieved.

APPEAL
DISMISSED.

HEARN, C.J.,
KITTREDGE, J., and CURETON, A.J., concur.

[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to
Rule 215, SCACR.

Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort

Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.