State v. Williams

CourtListener 10142890Scctapp07.06.2007

Gesamter Gesetzestext

THIS
OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE.  IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS
PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 239(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA

In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.

Dennis Williams, Appellant.

Appeal From Aiken County

 Reginald I. Lloyd, Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2007-UP-292

Submitted June 1, 2007 – Filed June 7,
2007

APPEAL DISMISSED

Appellate Defender Aileen P. Clare, of Columbia, for Appellant.

Teresa A. Knox, of Columbia, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM:  Dennis Williams appeals the revocation of his probation.  After a thorough review of the record and briefs
pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967) and State v.
Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we dismiss[1] Williams’s appeal and grant counsel’s motion to be relieved.

APPEAL DISMISSED.

HEARN, C.J., KITTREDGE,
J., and CURETON, A.J., concur.

[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to
Rule 215, SCACR.

Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort

Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.