State v. Brown

CourtListener 10142775Scctapp03.04.2007

Gesamter Gesetzestext

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE.  IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 239(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA

In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.

Dana Brown, Appellant.

Appeal From Aiken County

 Doyet A. Early, III, Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No.  2007-UP-146

Submitted April 2, 2007 – Filed April 3, 2007

APPEAL DISMISSED

Assistant Appellate Defender Robert M. Dudek,  of Columbia, for Appellant.

J. Benjamin Aplin,  South Carolina Department of Probation, Parole & Pardon Services, of Columbia, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM: Dana Brown appeals the revocation of his community supervision and consequent one-year sentence.  Brown’s counsel attached a petition to be relieved, stating he reviewed the record and concluded this appeal lacks merit.  After a thorough review pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967) and State v. Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we dismiss appellant’s appeal and grant counsel’s petition to be relieved.

APPEAL DISMISSED.         

ANDERSON and KITTREDGE,  JJ., and CURETON, A.J., concur.

Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort

Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.