State v. Morgan

CourtListener 10138477Scctapp08.08.2005

Gesamter Gesetzestext

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL
VALUE.  IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING
EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 239(D)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH
CAROLINA

In The Court of Appeals   

The
State,        Respondent,

v.

Jonathan Lee
Morgan,        Appellant.

Appeal From Darlington County

John M. Milling, Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No.
2005-UP-475

Submitted August 1, 2005 -  Filed August 8, 2005   

APPEAL DISMISSED

Acting Chief Attorney Joseph
L. Savitz III, Office of Appellate Defense, of Columbia,
for Appellant.

Attorney General Henry
Dargan McMaster, Chief Deputy Attorney General John W. McIntosh,
Assistant Deputy Attorney General Donald J. Zelenka, of Columbia; and
Solicitor Jay E. Hodge, Jr., of Cheraw, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM:  Jonathan
Lee Morgan appeals his guilty plea to voluntary manslaughter, destruction of
human remains, and possession of a firearm during the commission of a violent
crime.  Morgan argues the trial judge rendered Morgan’s guilty plea
conditional by advising him he had a right to appeal within ten days of
sentencing.  After a thorough review of the record and counsel’s brief
pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and State v.
Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we dismiss Morgan’s appeal
and grant counsel’s motion to be relieved.[1]

APPEAL DISMISSED.

HUFF and WILLIAMS, JJ., and
CURETON, A.J. concur.

[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215,
SCACR.

Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort

Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.