State v. Pilgrim

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL
VALUE.  IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING
EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 239(D)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH
CAROLINA

In The Court of Appeals

The
State,        Respondent,

v.

Joshua
Pilgrim,        Appellant.

Appeal From Pickens County

C. Victor Pyle, Jr., Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No.
2005-UP-476

Submitted August 1, 2005 – Filed August 8, 2005

APPEAL DISMISSED

Assistant Appellate Defender
Robert M. Dudek, of Columbia, for Appellant.

Attorney General Henry
Dargan McMaster, Chief Deputy Attorney General John W. McIntosh, and
Assistant Deputy Attorney General Salley W. Elliott, of Columbia, for
Respondent.

PER CURIAM:  Joshua
Pilgrim appeals his guilty plea to two counts of first-degree burglary, one
count of grand larceny, and two counts of petit larceny.  Pilgrim argues
the trial judge erred in accepting his plea because the court failed to comply
with the mandates set forth in Boykin v. Alabama, 395 U.S. 238
(1969).  After a thorough review of the record and counsel’s brief
pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and State v.
Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we dismiss Pilgrim’s appeal
and grant counsel’s motion to be relieved.[1]

APPEAL DISMISSED.

HUFF and WILLIAMS, JJ., and
CURETON, A.J. concur.

[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215,
SCACR.