CourtListener 10138467•State v. Miller
Gesamter Gesetzestext
THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL
VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING
EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 239(D)(2), SCACR.
THE STATE OF SOUTH
CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals
The
State, Respondent,
v.
JoAnne S.
Miller, Appellant.
Appeal From Greenville County
Henry F. Floyd, Circuit Court Judge
Unpublished Opinion No.
2005-UP-491
Submitted August 1, 2005 Filed August 17, 2005
APPEAL DISMISSED
Assistant Appellate Defender
Eleanor Duffy Cleary, Office of Appellate Defense, of Columbia,
for Appellant.
Assistant Deputy Attorney
General Salley W. Elliott, Office of the Attorney General, of Columbia,
for Respondent.
PER CURIAM: Joanne S.
Miller appeals her convictions for assault and battery of a high and aggravated
nature and criminal domestic violence of a high and aggravated nature.
Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), Millers counsel
attached a petition to be relieved as counsel to the final brief, stating she
reviewed the record and concluded this appeal lacks merit. Miller did not
file a separate pro se brief. After a thorough review of the
record and counsels brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S.
738 (1967), and State v. Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991),
we dismiss Millers appeal and grant counsels motion to be relieved.[1]
ANDERSON, HUFF, and WILLIAMS, JJ.,
concur.
[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215,
SCACR.
Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.