CourtListener 10138437•State v. Williams
Gesamter Gesetzestext
THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL
VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING
EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 239(d)(2), SCACR.
THE STATE OF SOUTH
CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals
The
State, Respondent,
v.
Tommy J.
Williams, Appellant.
Appeal From York County
J. Ernest Kinard, Jr., Circuit Court Judge
Unpublished Opinion No.
2005-UP-436
Submitted July 1, 2005 Filed July 13, 2005
APPEAL DISMISSED
Assistant Appellate Defender
Robert M. Dudek, of Columbia, for Appellant.
Attorney General Henry
Dargan McMaster, Chief Deputy Attorney General John W. McIntosh, and
Assistant Deputy Attorney General Salley W. Elliott, all of Columbia;
and Solicitor Thomas E. Pope of York, for Respondent.
PER CURIAM: Tommy
Williams appeals his convictions pursuant to a guilty plea for grand larceny,
possession of burglary tools, and burglary in the second degree. Williams
was sentenced to twenty years on the burglary charge, and five years each on the
grand larceny and the possession of burglary tools charges, to be served
concurrently. On appeal, Williams counsel filed a final brief along
with a petition to be relieved as counsel pursuant to Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738 (1967). After a thorough review of the record pursuant to Anders
and State v. Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we dismiss[1] the appeal and grant counsels
petition to be relieved.
APPEAL DISMISSED.
ANDERSON, STILWELL, and WILLIAMS,
JJ., concur.
[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215,
SCACR.
Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.