CourtListener 10138429•State v. Hills
Gesamter Gesetzestext
THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL
VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING
EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 239(d)(2), SCACR.
THE STATE OF SOUTH
CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals
The
State, Respondent,
v.
Calvin Hills, Appellant.
Appeal From Charleston County
Daniel F. Pieper, Circuit Court Judge
Unpublished Opinion No.
2005-UP-445
Submitted July 1, 2005 Filed July 14, 2005
APPEAL DISMISSED
Assistant Appellate Defender
Eleanor Duffy Cleary, Office of Appellate Defense, of Columbia,
for Appellant.
Attorney General Henry
Dargan McMaster, Chief Deputy Attorney General John W. McIntosh,
Assistant Deputy Attorney General Salley W. Elliott, Office of the
Attorney General, all of Columbia; and Solicitor Ralph E. Hoisington, of
Charleston, for Respondent.
PER CURIAM: Calvin Hills
appeals his convictions for possession of marijuana with intent to distribute,
trafficking cocaine, and possession of cocaine with intent to distribute within
proximity of a school. Hills counsel filed a motion to be relieved as
counsel pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967).
After a thorough review of the record and the briefs, we dismiss[1] this appeal pursuant to Anders and State
v. Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991). Counsels motion
to be relieved is granted.
APPEAL DISMISSED.
ANDERSON, STILWELL, and WILLIAMS,
JJ., concur.
[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215,
SCACR.
Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.