CourtListener 10138428•State v. Hughes
Gesamter Gesetzestext
THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL
VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING
EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 239(d)(2), SCACR.
THE STATE OF SOUTH
CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals
The
State, Respondent,
v.
Tracy
Hughes, Appellant.
Appeal From Spartanburg County
John W. Kittredge, Circuit Court Judge
Unpublished Opinion No.
2005-UP-446
Submitted July 1, 2005 Filed July 14, 2005
APPEAL DISMISSED
Assistant Appellate Defender
Tara S. Taggart, Office of Appellate Defense, of Columbia, for Appellant.
Attorney General Henry
Dargan McMaster, Chief Deputy Attorney General John W. McIntosh,
Assistant Deputy Attorney General Salley W. Elliott, Office of the
Attorney General, all of Columbia; and Solicitor Harold W. Gowdy, III,
of Spartanburg, for Respondent.
PER CURIAM: Tracy
Hughes appeals his conviction for felony driving under the influence resulting
in great bodily injury. Hughes filed a pro se brief. After a
thorough review of the record, counsels brief, and Hughes pro se
brief and review pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967)
and State v. Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we dismiss[1] Hughes appeal and grant counsels
motion to be relieved.
APPEAL DISMISSED.
ANDERSON, STILWELL, and WILLIAMS,
JJ., concur.
[1] We dismiss this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215,
SCACR.
Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.