CourtListener 10138391•State v. Legette
Gesamter Gesetzestext
THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 239(D)(2), SCACR.
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals
The State of South Carolina, Respondent,
v.
Fulton C. Legette, Appellant.
Appeal From Dillon County
Paul M. Burch, Circuit Court Judge
Unpublished Opinion No. 2005-UP-377
Submitted June 1, 2005 Filed June 13, 2005
APPEAL DISMISSED
Assistant Appellate Defender Tara S. Taggart, of Columbia, for Appellant.
Attorney General Henry D. McMaster, Chief Deputy Attorney General John W. McIntosh, and Assistant Deputy Attorney General Salley W. Elliott, all of Columbia and Solicitor Jay E. Hodge, Jr., of Cheraw, for Respondent.
PER CURIAM: Fulton Legette appeals the denial of his motion for directed verdict, arguing the State presented insufficient evidence of guilt. After a thorough review of the record and counsels brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and State v. Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we dismiss Legettes appeal, and grant counsels motion to be relieved.
APPEAL DISMISSED. [1]
ANDERSON, STILWELL and WILLIAMS, JJ., concur.
[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.
Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.